On-Demand   MP3 Audio

Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case

Recorded on: Jun. 7, 2012
Running Time: 01:01:26

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:10:07] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: Elements and Burdens in a Patent Infringement Case and the Defendant's Response Elizabeth Day ~ Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:15:24] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: Patent Prosecution for Litigators Sanjeet K. Dutta ~ King & Spalding LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:04:49] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: The Markman Process and Hearing Madison C. Jellins ~ Jellins Christensen LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:26] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case Ian N. Feinberg ~ Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:36] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: The ITC and Other Forum, Venue and Remedy Issues Gary M. Hnath ~ Mayer Brown LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:11] Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012: Critical Issues That Win a Patent Infringement Case for a Plaintiff and a Defendant Brandon Baum ~ Baum Legal
On-Demand MP3 MP4
Taken from the Web Program Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012 Recorded June, 2012 in San Francisco

Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case [01:01:26]
  • The AIA’s new joinder rules
  • Likely effect of AIA new joinder rules on particular venues
  • Which districts have the most patent cases filed by patent owners, and the most filed by accused infringers?
  • In which districts is summary judgment most often granted? In which is it rarely, if ever, granted?
  • Trial rate and time to trial in various districts
  • Comparison of local patent rules used in popular for patent litigation districts
  • Timeline of various events that take place in a typical district court patent case
The purchase price of this segment includes the following article(s) from the Course Handbook available online:
  • Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case
    Ian N. Feinberg, John J. Molenda, Ph.D.

Presentation Material


  • Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case
    Ian N. Feinberg
Speaker(s)
Ian N. Feinberg ~ Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs.


PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA1, CO, FL, GA, ID*, IL, KS2, ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH*, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR*, PA, TX3, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI.
 

1California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit.

2Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing.

3Texas: Considered self-study credit.  There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit.

Please note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement.

*
PLI will apply for credit upon request.



Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same.
Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers.

Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT


While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program.  Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit.
 
Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library".  If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library.  Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window.  A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form.


Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department.  PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours.


If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance.

GENERAL INFORMATION

This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered.  However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services.  If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Patent Litigation 2013 (New York, NY) Nov. 11 - 12, 2013
Patent Litigation 2013 (Chicago, IL) Oct. 9 - 10, 2013

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 Jun. 19, 2013
Patent Law Institute 2013 (7th Annual) Apr. 2, 2013
Patent Litigation 2012 Oct. 12, 2012

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Patent Litigation 2013  
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (7th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Patent Litigation 2012 Christopher K. Hu, Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Jeanne M. Gills, Foley & Lardner LLP
Edward G. Poplawski, Sidley Austin LLP
 
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (6th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Print Share Email