Advanced Search

Seminars & Webcasts

On-Demand Learning

Publications

Patent Bar Review

Blogs

On-Demand Web Programs

Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation

Released on: Sep. 20, 2012

Running Time: 03:13:00

Segments
Overview
Faculty
CLE Credit

Running Time	Segment Title	Faculty
[01:08:39]	Commencing the Representation	Ana de Alba ~ Attorney at Law, Lang, Richert & Patch Robert A. Hawley ~ Deputy Executive Director, State Bar of California Toby J Rothschild ~ General Counsel, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Elizabeth Bluestein ~ General Counsel, Public Counsel Bruce Ives ~ Vice-President & Deputy General Counsel, Enterprise Group, Hewlett-Packard Company Maeve Elise Brown ~ Executive Director, Housing and Economic Rights Advocates Tiela Chalmers ~ Consultant, Tiela Chalmers Consulting Renee Glover Chantler ~ Pro Bono Counsel, DLA Piper LLP
[00:55:25]	Conducting the Representation	Ana de Alba ~ Attorney at Law, Lang, Richert & Patch Robert A. Hawley ~ Deputy Executive Director, State Bar of California Toby J Rothschild ~ General Counsel, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Elizabeth Bluestein ~ General Counsel, Public Counsel Bruce Ives ~ Vice-President & Deputy General Counsel, Enterprise Group, Hewlett-Packard Company Maeve Elise Brown ~ Executive Director, Housing and Economic Rights Advocates Tiela Chalmers ~ Consultant, Tiela Chalmers Consulting Renee Glover Chantler ~ Pro Bono Counsel, DLA Piper LLP
[01:00:55]	Specific Application of Pro Bono in Various Practice Settings - Hypotheticals	Ana de Alba ~ Attorney at Law, Lang, Richert & Patch Robert A. Hawley ~ Deputy Executive Director, State Bar of California Toby J Rothschild ~ General Counsel, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Elizabeth Bluestein ~ General Counsel, Public Counsel Bruce Ives ~ Vice-President & Deputy General Counsel, Enterprise Group, Hewlett-Packard Company Maeve Elise Brown ~ Executive Director, Housing and Economic Rights Advocates Tiela Chalmers ~ Consultant, Tiela Chalmers Consulting Renee Glover Chantler ~ Pro Bono Counsel, DLA Piper LLP

While the ethical obligations of Pro Bono legal practice are no different than a commercial law practice, there are practical considerations regarding eligibility of clients, challenging clients, conflicts (similar in theory, different in practice settings), expectations on both sides, case management responsibility, and different delivery models, such as limited scope representation, that cause many professionals to hesitate offering pro bono legal services. This program is designed to answer questions regarding the professional responsibility obligations of pro bono legal service, encourage attorneys to engage in this professionally rewarding aspect of law practice, and remove ambiguities that are barriers to engaging in pro bono legal services.

Lecture Topics [Total time 03:13:00]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

Program Overview and Introductions* [00:08:01]
Robert A. Hawley
Commencing the Representation [01:08:39]
Robert A. Hawley, Toby Rothschild, Elizabeth Bluestein, Tiela Chalmers, Renee Glover Chantler, Ana de Alba, Bruce Ives, Maeve Elise Brown
Conducting the Representation [00:55:25]
Elizabeth Bluestein, Tiela Chalmers, Toby Rothschild, Renee Glover Chantler, Ana de Alba, Maeve Elise Brown, Robert A. Hawley, Bruce Ives
Specific Application of Pro Bono in Various Practice Settings - Hypotheticals [01:00:55]
Ana de Alba, Elizabeth Bluestein, Maeve Elise Brown, Tiela Chalmers, Renee Glover Chantler, Bruce Ives, Robert A. Hawley, Toby Rothschild

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation Outline
Robert A. Hawley
The State Bar of California Board Resolution on Pro Bono, 2002
Robert A. Hawley
The Ethics of Pro Bono
Toby Rothschild
California Business & Professions Code Section 6068
Robert A. Hawley
An Ethics Primer on Limited Scope Representation, Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct
Robert A. Hawley, Tiela Chalmers
Commencing the Representation (PowerPoint Slides)
Robert A. Hawley
Current California Rules of Professional Conduct
Robert A. Hawley
Proposed California Rules of Professional Conduct
Robert A. Hawley
The Ethics of Pro Bono Handbook, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles
Toby Rothschild
Conducting the Representation (PowerPoint Slides)
Robert A. Hawley
Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation Hypotheticals
Robert A. Hawley
Additional References
Robert A. Hawley
Specific Application of Pro Bono in Various Practice Settings--Hypotheticals (PowerPoint Slides)
Robert A. Hawley
Index to Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation

Presentation Material

Commencing the Representation
Robert A. Hawley, Toby Rothschild, Elizabeth Bluestein, Tiela Chalmers, Renee Glover Chantler, Ana de Alba, Bruce Ives, Maeve Elise Brown
Pro Bono Opportunities
Practising Law Institute
Conducting the Representation
Elizabeth Bluestein, Tiela Chalmers, Toby Rothschild, Renee Glover Chantler, Ana de Alba, Maeve Elise Brown, Robert A. Hawley, Bruce Ives
Specific Application of Pro Bono in Various Practice Settings - Hypotheticals
Ana de Alba, Elizabeth Bluestein, Maeve Elise Brown, Tiela Chalmers, Renee Glover Chantler, Bruce Ives, Robert A. Hawley, Toby Rothschild

Chairperson(s)

Robert A. Hawley ~ Deputy Executive Director, State Bar of California

Speaker(s)

Ana de Alba ~ Attorney at Law, Lang, Richert & Patch

Elizabeth Bluestein ~ General Counsel, Public Counsel

Maeve Elise Brown ~ Executive Director, Housing and Economic Rights Advocates

Tiela Chalmers ~ Consultant, Tiela Chalmers Consulting

Renee Glover Chantler ~ Pro Bono Counsel, DLA Piper LLP

Bruce Ives ~ Vice-President & Deputy General Counsel, Enterprise Group, Hewlett-Packard Company

Toby J Rothschild ~ General Counsel, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa²*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon*, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date.

⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year.

⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats.

⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs.

⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.

¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.

¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.

If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

Course Handbook Archive

Ethics CA PB Rep 13
Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation	Robert A. Hawley, State Bar of California

Related Treatises

Fashion Law and Business: Brands & Retailers

Social Media and the Law

Post-Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

FOLLOW PLI:

Practice Areas

Location

Credit Type

Format

Practice Areas

Credit Type

Format

Specialty

Practice Areas

Format

Subscriptions

On-Demand Web Programs

Ethical Issues in California Pro Bono Representation

On-Demand Segment

CREDIT INFORMATION

Related Items

Course Handbook Archive

CREDIT INFORMATION

Check Specific State Credit Requirements

Related Treatises


	Practice Areas Accounting Banking Bankruptcy & Restructuring Corporate & Securities Employment Ethics/Professional Responsibility Health Care Intellectual Property International Litigation Patent Pro Bono Professional Skills Real Estate Tax Location New York, NY San Francisco, CA Chicago, IL Washington, DC Los Angeles, CA Credit Type Elimination of Bias Ethics General Professional Practice Skills Substance Abuse Format Seminars Webcasts Groupcasts One-Hour Briefings


	The Exam Live Courses Homestudy Course Testimonials FAQ's For Engineers & Scientists


	Securities Law Practice Center Patent Law Practice Center PLI Librarian


	On-Demand Segment Description Faculty CLE Credit PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs. PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA¹, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, KS², ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX³, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI. ¹California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit. ²Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing. ³Texas: Considered self-study credit. There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit. Please note:* The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers. Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program. Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit. Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library". If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library. Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window. A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form. Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department. PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours. If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance. GENERAL INFORMATION This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered. However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state. On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in: Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois , Iowa², Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming. Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs. Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs. ¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits. ²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. ³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit. ⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date. ⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. ⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. ⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. ⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program. ⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs. ¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour. ¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component. ¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented. ¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions. ¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu. Add to Cart Membership Suite Options: Add to My List Register From Roster Request Groupcast Receive all of the items below at the reduced price of $0.00 A combined savings of $0.00 Buy Combo CREDIT INFORMATION Credits for: