Advanced Search

Seminars & Webcasts

On-Demand Learning

Publications

Patent Bar Review

Blogs

On-Demand Web Programs

Electronic Discovery Institute 2013: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know

Released on: Oct. 8, 2013

Running Time: 06:09:54

Segments
Overview
Faculty
CLE Credit

Running Time	Segment Title	Faculty
[01:05:05]	View from the Bench: Status of E-discovery Law	Hon. James C. Francis IV ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York Hon. David J. Waxse ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, District of Kansas
[00:59:35]	Litigation Begins: Steps to take early on	Stanley M. Gibson ~ Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell LLP Ronald J. Hedges ~ Former United States Magistrate Judge, Ronald J. Hedges, LLC Gilbert S. Keteltas ~ Baker & Hostetler LLP
[01:01:01]	Technology Assisted Review, Predictive Coding and New Search Technologies	Maura R. Grossman ~ Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Ashish S. Prasad ~ Chief Executive Officer, Discovery Services LLC Brian C. Rocca ~ Bingham McCutchen LLP
[01:01:51]	Annual Update of In-house Counsel's Guide to E-discovery: Everything You Need to Know	Steven C. Bennett ~ Jones Day John J. Rosenthal ~ Winston & Strawn LLP
[00:56:48]	Ethics in E-discovery	David J. Lender ~ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
[00:59:14]	Hot Topics in E-discovery: Proposed Amendments to Rule 37(e)	Ariana J. Tadler ~ Milberg LLP Jeffrey J. Fowler ~ O'Melveny & Myers LLP Thomas Y. Allman ~ Adjunct Professor, University of Cincinnati College of Law;, Chair Emeritus, The Sedona Conference Working Group (WG1) on E-Discovery

The demands and costs of e-discovery in litigation continue to grow. Nearly every case now involves some sort of e-discovery, and it is essential to know how to effectively and fairly handle the many issues that can arise. Our outstanding faculty of experienced lawyers, judges, and e-discovery professionals will provide an inside look at the current state of e-discovery, give tips for avoiding pitfalls litigants have encountered in the years since the passage of the federal rules, and discuss important ethical issues in light of court decisions imposing discovery sanctions and outlining the duties of outside and in-house counsel.

This seminar is designed to provide counsel with the understanding necessary to advise clients on state, federal and international e-discovery strategic and technology issues. You will take away practical strategies you can use when you are called upon to provide guidance on e-retention policies or e-discovery.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:09:54]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

Introduction* [00:06:20]
Gary A. Adler
View from the Bench: Status of E-discovery Law [01:05:05]
Hon. James C. Francis IV, Hon. David J. Waxse
Litigation Begins: Steps to take early on [00:59:35]
Ronald J. Hedges, Gilbert S. Keteltas, Stanley M. Gibson
Technology Assisted Review, Predictive Coding and New Search Technologies [01:01:01]
Maura R. Grossman, Ashish S. Prasad, Brian C. Rocca
Annual Update of In-house Counsel's Guide to E-discovery: Everything You Need to Know [01:01:51]
John J. Rosenthal, Steven C. Bennett
Ethics in E-discovery [00:56:48]
David J. Lender
Hot Topics in E-discovery: Proposed Amendments to Rule 37(e) [00:59:14]
Thomas Y. Allman, Jeffrey J. Fowler, Ariana J. Tadler

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

How Can Courts Encourage Cooperation in Discovery?
Steven C. Bennett
Managing E-Discovery Projects: Ten Key Steps
Steven C. Bennett
Experts on Computer-Assisted Review: Why Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Should Apply to Their Use
Hon. David J. Waxse
Judicial Modesty: the Case for Jurist Restraint in the New Electronic Age
Hon. James C. Francis IV
The New Proposed Federal Rules and How to Use Them in the Rule 26(f) Conference Now
Stanley M. Gibson
Bridging the Technical and Legal Divide: Information Retrieval Process Quality Standards for Counsel
Gilbert S. Keteltas
The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review with Forward by John M. Facciola, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Gordon V. Cormack, Maura R. Grossman
Problems and Solutions in Electronic Discovery
Ashish S. Prasad
Technology-Assisted Review, Predictive Coding and New Search Technologies
Brian C. Rocca
Managing E-Discovery Costs: Mission Possible
Steven C. Bennett
Chapter 13 Ethics and Electronic Discovery
David J. Lender
Proposed Rule 37(e): Addressing Spoliation Unfairness by a Comprehensive National Rule
Thomas Y. Allman

Presentation Material

Introduction
Gary A. Adler
Technology-Assisted Review, Predictive Coding and New Search Technologies
Maura R. Grossman, Ashish S. Prasad, Brian C. Rocca
Annual Update of In-House Counsel's Guide to E-Discovery
John J. Rosenthal, Steven C. Bennett
Ethics in E-Discovery
David J. Lender
Hot Topics in E-Discovery: Proposed Amendments to Rule 37(e)
Thomas Y. Allman, Jeffrey J. Fowler, Ariana J. Tadler

Chairperson(s)

Gary A. Adler ~ Bingham McCutchen LLP

Speaker(s)

Thomas Y. Allman ~ Adjunct Professor, University of Cincinnati College of Law;, Chair Emeritus, The Sedona Conference Working Group (WG1) on E-Discovery

Steven C. Bennett ~ Jones Day

Jeffrey J. Fowler ~ O'Melveny & Myers LLP

Hon. James C. Francis IV ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Stanley M. Gibson ~ Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell LLP

Maura R. Grossman ~ Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

Ronald J. Hedges ~ Former United States Magistrate Judge, Ronald J. Hedges, LLC

Gilbert S. Keteltas ~ Baker & Hostetler LLP

David J. Lender ~ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Ashish S. Prasad ~ Chief Executive Officer, Discovery Services LLC

Brian C. Rocca ~ Bingham McCutchen LLP

John J. Rosenthal ~ Winston & Strawn LLP

Ariana J. Tadler ~ Milberg LLP

Hon. David J. Waxse ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, District of Kansas

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa²*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon*, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date.

⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year.

⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats.

⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs.

⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.

¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.

¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.

If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

Live Seminars

Electronic Discovery Institute 2014: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know (New York, NY)

Sep. 30, 2014

Course Handbook Archive

Electronic Discovery Institute 2014: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know
Electronic Discovery 2013	Steven C. Bennett, Jones Day Gary A. Adler, Bingham McCutchen LLP Adam I. Cohen, Ernst & Young Marla S.K. Bergman, Goldman Sachs & Co.

Related Treatises

Patent Licensing: Strategy, Negotiation, and Forms

Electronic Discovery Deskbook

Kane on Trademark Law: A Practitioner's Guide

FOLLOW PLI:

Practice Areas

Location

Credit Type

Format

Practice Areas

Credit Type

Format

Specialty

Practice Areas

Format

Subscriptions

On-Demand Web Programs

Electronic Discovery Institute 2013: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know

On-Demand Segment

CREDIT INFORMATION

Related Items

Live Seminars

Course Handbook Archive

CREDIT INFORMATION

Check Specific State Credit Requirements

Related Treatises


	Practice Areas Accounting Banking Bankruptcy & Restructuring Communications / Telecommunications Corporate & Securities Employment Ethics/Professional Responsibility Intellectual Property International Litigation Patent Pro Bono Professional Skills Real Estate Tax Location New York, NY San Francisco, CA Chicago, IL Washington, DC Los Angeles, CA Credit Type Elimination of Bias Ethics General Professional Practice Skills Substance Abuse Format Seminars Groupcasts Webcasts One-Hour Briefings


	The Exam Live Courses Homestudy Course Testimonials FAQ's For Engineers & Scientists


	Securities Law Practice Center Patent Law Practice Center PLI Librarian


	On-Demand Segment Description Faculty CLE Credit PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs. PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA¹, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, KS², ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX³, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI. ¹California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit. ²Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing. ³Texas: Considered self-study credit. There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit. Please note:* The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers. Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program. Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit. Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library". If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library. Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window. A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form. Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department. PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours. If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance. GENERAL INFORMATION This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered. However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state. On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in: Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois , Iowa², Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming. Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs. Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs. ¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits. ²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. ³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit. ⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date. ⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. ⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. ⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. ⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program. ⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs. ¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour. ¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component. ¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented. ¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions. ¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu. Add to Cart Membership Suite Options: Add to My List Register From Roster Request Groupcast Receive all of the items below at the reduced price of $0.00 A combined savings of $0.00 Buy Combo CREDIT INFORMATION Credits for: