On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

California Employment Law Update 2013

Released on: Sep. 24, 2013
Running Time: 07:17:55

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:07:28] Year in Review Timothy J. Long ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Gillian Lester ~ Acting Dean, Alexander F. and May T. Morrison Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:03:15] Key Wage and Hour Developments Jahan C. Sagafi ~ Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Robert R. Roginson ~ Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:35] Accommodating Disabilities and Pregnancy Phyllis W. Cheng ~ Director, Department of Fair Employment and Housing, State of California, State and Consumer Services Agency
Tracey S. Lesetar ~ General Counsel, Bellator MMA
Noah Lebowitz ~ Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:57:15] Elimination of Bias Roundtable Joan C. Williams ~ Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Hastings Foundation Chair, UC Hastings College of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:30] Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims John T. Mullan ~ Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe, LLP
Aaron L. Agenbroad ~ Jones Day
Lawrence H. Wexler ~ Senior Counsel, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:02:15] Trends with Class and Pattern Cases in California William R. Tamayo ~ Regional Attorney, San Francisco District Office, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Adam P. KohSweeney ~ O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Roberta L. Steele ~ Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:02:25] Ethical Considerations in Trade Secret Litigation: A California Employment Law Case Study Vanessa L. Holton ~ Assistant Chief Counsel, California Department of Industrial Relations
Michael D. Weil ~ Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Mindy M. Morton ~ Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4

PLI’s California Employment Law Update addresses the issues confronted by employment law advisers, litigators and human resources management and professionals, with particular emphasis on California State law considerations. This program combines a comprehensive review of case law and regulatory developments, an in-depth analysis of emerging issues, and practical guidance about best practices to maximize employment law compliance, mitigate legal risk and achieve business objectives.

Lecture Topics  [Total time 07:17:55]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:05:12]
    Timothy J. Long
  • Year in Review [01:07:28]
    Timothy J. Long, Gillian Lester
  • Key Wage and Hour Developments [01:03:15]
    Robert R. Roginson, Jahan C. Sagafi
  • Accommodating Disabilities and Pregnancy [01:01:35]
    Phyllis W. Cheng, Noah Lebowitz, Tracey S. Lesetar
  • Elimination of Bias Roundtable [00:57:15]
    Joan C. Williams
  • Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims [00:58:30]
    Aaron L. Agenbroad, Lawrence H. Wexler, John T. Mullan
  • Trends with Class and Pattern Cases in California [01:02:15]
    Roberta L. Steele, William R. Tamayo, Adam P. KohSweeney
  • Ethical Considerations in Trade Secret Litigation: A California Employment Law Case Study [01:02:25]
    Vanessa L. Holton, Mindy M. Morton, Michael D. Weil

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Year in Review
    Gillian Lester, Timothy J. Long
  • Key Wage and Hour Developments
    Jahan C. Sagafi, Robert R. Roginson
  • Hyperlink to: Phyllis W. Cheng, Transformative Year for Civil Rights in CA, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Aug. 2, 2012
    Phyllis W. Cheng
  • The Fair Employment Housing Commission’s Parting Gift: Comprehensive Pregnancy & Disability Regulations
    Noah Lebowitz
  • Accommodating Disabilities and Pregnancy
    Tracey S. Lesetar
  • New FEHA Disability & Pregnancy Regulations (PowerPoint Slides)
    Phyllis W. Cheng
  • Joan C. Williams & Rachel Dempsey, Draft Copy of Forthcoming Chapter, What Works for Women at Work, Four Patterns Every Woman Should Know, A New Girls’ Network Book
    Joan C. Williams
  • Retaliation & Whistleblower Claims
    Aaron L. Agenbroad
  • Update on Recent Retaliation and Whistleblower Cases
    John T. Mullan
  • Class and Pattern Cases: Emerging Trends and Issues (Prepared on July 10, 2013)
    Apalla U. Chopra
  • Class Action Developments and Trends (July 8, 2013)
    Roberta L. Steele
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Strategic Enforcement Plan, FY 2013-2016
    William R. Tamayo
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Guarding Trade Secrets, Chapter 9, Employment Law Yearbook 2013 (April 2013)
    Michael D. Weil

Presentation Material

  • Year in Review
    Timothy J. Long, Gillian Lester
  • Key Wage and Hour Developments
    Robert R. Roginson,Jahan C. Sagafi
  • Accomodating Disabilities and Pregnancy (Handout)
    Phyllis W. Cheng
  • New FEHA Disability & Pregnancy Regulations
    Phyllis W. Cheng
  • Elimination of Bias Roundtable Luncheon
    Joan C. Williams
  • Elimination of Bias Roundtable
    Joan C. Williams
  • Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims
    John T. Mullan
  • Trends with Class and Pattern Cases in California (Handout)
    William R. Tamayo
  • Ethical Considerations in Trade Secret Litigation: A California Employment Law Case Study
    Michael D. Weil
  • Ethical Considerations in Trade Secret Litigation: A California Employment Law Case Study (Handout)
    Michael D. Weil
  • Ethical Considerations in Trade Secret Litigation: A California Employment Law Case Study (Handout)
    Michael D. Weil
Chairperson(s)
Timothy J. Long ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Speaker(s)
Aaron L. Agenbroad ~ Jones Day
Phyllis W. Cheng ~ Director, Department of Fair Employment and Housing, State of California, State and Consumer Services Agency
Vanessa L. Holton ~ Assistant Chief Counsel, California Department of Industrial Relations
Adam P. KohSweeney ~ O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Noah Lebowitz ~ Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier LLP
Tracey S. Lesetar ~ General Counsel, Bellator MMA
Gillian Lester ~ Acting Dean, Alexander F. and May T. Morrison Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law
Mindy M. Morton ~ Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
John T. Mullan ~ Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe, LLP
Robert R. Roginson ~ Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jahan C. Sagafi ~ Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Roberta L. Steele ~ Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho
William R. Tamayo ~ Regional Attorney, San Francisco District Office, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Michael D. Weil ~ Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Lawrence H. Wexler ~ Senior Counsel, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Joan C. Williams ~ Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Hastings Foundation Chair, UC Hastings College of Law

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

California Employment Law Update 2014 (San Francisco, CA) Sep. 16, 2014

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

California Employment Law Update 2014  
California Employment Law Update 2013 Timothy J. Long, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
 
Print Share Email