On-Demand   MP3 Audio
  Also Available in:  On-Demand Audio Only On-Demand Web

American Express v. Italian Colors: Supreme Court Says Basta! to Plaintiffs Seeking to Dodge Arbitration Agreements

Recorded on: Jul. 23, 2013
Running Time: 01:04:28

Taken from the briefing American Express v. Italian Colors: Supreme Court Says Basta! to Plaintiffs Seeking to Dodge Arbitration Agreements 2013 recorded July, 2013.

On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States re-visited the question of the extent to which a party to an otherwise enforceable arbitration agreement could wriggle free from the arbitrability requirement. The decision – American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant – builds on a recent line of pro-arbitration rulings – including Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. Animal Feeds Int’l Corp. and AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion – and reaffirms the Court’s commitment to enforcing arbitration agreements. In a 5-3 opinion by Justice Scalia, the Court held in Italian Colors that a contractual provision mandating individual arbitration by means of a class action waiver is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), even if the costs of individual arbitration outweigh the potential recovery. Plaintiffs had argued that the costs of individual arbitration were so high that they would not be able to “effectively vindicate” their federal statutory rights under the antitrust laws. But the Supreme Court shut the door on plaintiffs’ repeated efforts to push for the application of this “effective vindication” exception that had been crafted by lower courts (including those in the Second Circuit). That exception had its origins in dicta and had never been applied by the Supreme Court.

This briefing was conducted by Michael B. Miller, a litigation partner in the New York office of Morrison & Foerster LLP. Mr. Miller has significant experience litigating antitrust, privacy, and large commercial cases in federal and state courts. He has experience both in litigating in the arbitrable forum, and in moving to compel arbitration where one party seeks to avoid their agreement to arbitrate by filing a complaint in federal or state court (including in the Second Circuit, whose decision the Italian Colors Court reversed). He will address the opinion in Italian Colors and its implications for arbitrability disputes and especially class litigation going forward.

Lecture Topics  [Total Time: 01:04:28]

  • How the Italian Colors Court changed or reinforced existing law
  • What’s left for those seeking to avoid arbitration agreements
  • What you need to know to draft enforceable arbitration agreements
  • Possible litigation and regulatory responses
  • What this likely means for various industries given the use of arbitration clauses in various types of agreements

Presentation Material

  • American Express v. Italian Colors: The Supreme Court Reaffirms Its Commitment to Enforcing Arbitration Agreements
  • American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Speaker(s)
Michael B. Miller ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs.


PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA1, CO, FL, GA, ID*, IL, KS2, ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH*, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR*, PA, TX3, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI.
 

1California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit.

2Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing.

3Texas: Considered self-study credit.  There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit.

Please note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement.

*
PLI will apply for credit upon request.



Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same.
Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers.

Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT


While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program.  Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit.
 
Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library".  If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library.  Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window.  A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form.


Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department.  PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours.


If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance.

GENERAL INFORMATION

This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered.  However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services.  If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Print Share Email