On-Demand   Audio Only On-Demand Web
  Also Available in:  On-Demand MP3 Audio

A Capital Idea? Proposed Changes to the U.S. Regulatory Capital Framework 2012 (Audio-only)

Released on: Jul. 17, 2012
Running Time: 01:09:55

Taken from the briefing A Capital Idea? Proposed Changes to the U.S. Regulatory Capital Framework recorded July, 2012.

On June 12, 2012, the Federal banking agencies formally proposed for comment, in three separate but related proposals, significant changes to the U.S. regulatory capital framework: the Basel III Proposal, which applies the Basel III capital framework to almost all U.S. banking organizations; the Standardized Approach Proposal, which applies certain elements of the Basel II standardized approach for credit risk weightings to almost all U.S. banking organizations, and the Advanced Approaches Proposal, which applies changes made to Basel II and Basel III in the past few years to large U.S. banking organizations subject to the advanced Basel II capital framework.  The Basel III and the Standardized Approach Proposals are applicable to all U.S. banks and bank holding companies subject to minimum capital requirements other than “small bank holding companies” (generally bank holding companies with consolidated assets of less than $500 million).

Listen to Charles M. Horn of Morrison & Foerster LLP, Bert Ely of Ely & Company, Inc. and Anthony Ragozino of UBS Securities LLC for an overview and discussion about the proposals.

Lecture Topics  [Total Time: 01:09:55]

  • Overview of the new capital requirements: core elements, minimum requirements and transition periods;
  • Components of common equity, additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital;
  • Regulatory capital adjustments and deductions;
  • Elements and consequences of the Standardized Approach risk weights;
  • Impact on capital instruments and other financial products; contingent convertible/bail-in instruments; and
  • Differences between the proposed rules and Basel III and CRD IV.

Presentation Material

  • A Capital Idea? Proposed Changes to the U.S. Regulatory Capital Framework
    Charles M. Horn, Bert Ely, Anthony Ragozino
  • The Federal Banking Agencies’ Regulatory Capital Proposals - A Summary
    Charles M. Horn
  • The Banking Agencies’ New Regulatory Capital Proposals
    Charles M. Horn
  • A Capital Idea? Proposed Changes to the U.S. Regulatory Capital Framework
    Charles M. Horn, Bert Ely, Anthony Ragozino
Speaker(s)
Bert Ely ~ Ely & Company, Inc.
Charles M. Horn ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
Anthony Ragozino ~ UBS Securities LLC

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina8, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.
Minnesota  approves live webcasts ONLY

The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email