FacultyFaculty/Author Profile
Stephen C. Durant

Stephen C. Durant

Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.

San Jose, CA, USA


Stephen Durant is a shareholder in the law firm Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A., San Jose, California. He has written and prosecuted patents in a wide range of technologies including software, computers, electronic circuits, holography, MEMS, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, microprocessors, wired and wireless telecommunication devices, network architectures, database software, electronic design automation, disk drives, Internet software, motion picture animation, computer graphics processing and business methods. His practice is devoted to developing intellectual property portfolios aligned with business goals; enforcement and litigation strategy involving infringement, non-infringement and invalidity analyses, reexaminations and reissues; IP due diligence directed to financings, mergers & acquisitions and licensing; working with business managers to maximize portfolio value; assessing, avoiding and responding to third-party IP threats; and providing legal opinions. His experience also includes advising companies on copyright, trademark, trade secret and licensing. He has represented numerous high-technology clients including start-ups, emerging companies, public companies and universities in technology-related IP issues. Steve held leadership roles in the formation of the patent prosecution practices at Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati in Palo Alto and later at Morrison Foerster in San Francisco. Steve was a partner at each of those law firms. Steve worked in-house at the Hughes Aircraft Company, Space & Communications Group, in El Segundo, CA in the mid 80’s. Mr. Durant is a graduate of Cornell Law School, J.D, 1981 and University of Notre Dame, B.S.E.E., 1978.

Bar Admissions:
  • California
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Education:
  • Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York, 1981, J.D.
  • University of Notre Dame, Indiana, 1978, B.S.E.E.
Stephen C. Durant is associated with the following items:
CHB Chapters  CHB Chapters Patentable Subject Matter Eligibility in the Aftermath of Bilski and Prometheus - Patent Litigation 2012 , Thursday, September 27, 2012
Web Segment  Web Segment Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods - Patent Litigation 2012 , Friday, September 28, 2012
Practice before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Part Three - How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012 , Thursday, October 04, 2012
The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part Two - How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012 , Thursday, October 04, 2012
The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part One - How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012 , Thursday, October 04, 2012
Transcripts  Transcripts Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods - Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods , Friday, September 28, 2012
MP3 Audio  MP3 Audio Patent Litigation 2012: Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods - Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods , Monday, October 01, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part Two - The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part Two , Thursday, October 04, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part One - The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part One , Thursday, October 04, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: Practice before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Part Three - Practice before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Part Three , Thursday, October 04, 2012
MP4 - Mobile Video Seg  MP4 - Mobile Video Seg Patent Litigation 2012: Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods - Two Years After Bilski - The Patentability Of Business Methods , Monday, October 01, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part One - The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part One , Thursday, October 04, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: Practice before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Part Three - Practice before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Part Three , Thursday, October 04, 2012
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012: The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part Two - The New Framework for Resolving Patent Disputes within the PTO, Part Two , Thursday, October 04, 2012
On-Demand Web Programs  On-Demand Web Programs Patent Litigation 2012 , Friday, October 12, 2012 , San Francisco, CA
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012 , Wednesday, October 17, 2012 , San Francisco, CA
LiveSeminar  Live Seminar Patent Litigation 2012 , Thursday, September 27, 2012 , San Francisco, CA
How to Effectively Prosecute AIA Post-Grant Proceedings 2012 , Wednesday, October 03, 2012 , San Francisco, CA
Print Share Email