| Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2013: Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing Table of Contents |
|
|
| Chapter 1: Prosecution Ethics, Including Therasense v. Becton Dickinson |
Robert C. Faber ~ Ostrolenk Faber LLP
|
|
| Chapter 2: Therasense, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 649 F. 3d 1276, 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1065 (Fed. Cir., May 2011) (Powerpoint Slides) |
Robert C. Faber ~ Ostrolenk Faber LLP
|
|
| Chapter 3: § 1.56 Duty to Disclose Information Material to Patentability |
Robert C. Faber ~ Ostrolenk Faber LLP
|
|
| Chapter 4: § 10.20 et seq. Canons and Disciplinary Rules, Patent and Trademark Office Code of Professional Responsibility |
Robert C. Faber ~ Ostrolenk Faber LLP
|
|
| Chapter 5: Drafting an Effective Specification for the Chemical Patent Application |
John C. Todaro ~ Merck & Co., Inc.
|
|
| Chapter 6: Finding Support in the AIA |
Rebecca Goldman Rudich ~ Vedder Price P.C.
|
|
| Chapter 7: Drafting the Specification |
Kenneth N. Nigon ~ RatnerPrestia
|
|
| Chapter 8: Chemical and Pharmaceutical Claim Drafting (Powerpoint Slides) |
Michael A. Davitz ~ Fahmi, Sellers, Embert & Davitz LLP
|
|
| Chapter 9: Drafting Claims for Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patent Applications |
Jay P. Lessler ~ Blank Rome LLP
|
|
| Chapter 10: The Winning Mechanical Claim |
Robert C. Faber ~ Ostrolenk Faber LLP
|
|
| Chapter 11: Crafting the Claims |
Ann M. McCrackin ~ Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
|
|
| Chapter 12: The America Invents Act, the Next Round: Implementation of First Inventor to File Rules and Post Grant Procedures (Powerpoint Slides) |
Kenneth N. Nigon ~ RatnerPrestia
|
|
| Chapter 13: Post-Grant Review Under the America Invents Act |
Gerard F. Diebner ~ Tannenbaum, Helpern, Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP
|
|
| Chapter 14: Effect of the America Invents Act on Patent Application Filing Strategy |
Thomas J. Kowalski ~ Vedder Price, P.C.
Deborah L. Lu ~ Vedder Price, P.C.
|
|
| Chapter 15: The Use of “Means Plus Function” Language in Patent Claims |
Robert D. Schaffer ~ Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer LLP
|
|
| Chapter 16: The Use of “Means Plus Function” Language in Patent Claims (Powerpoint Slides) |
Robert D. Schaffer ~
|
|
| Chapter 17: Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. 101 (Post-Bilski) (Powerpoint Slides) |
Michael P. Dunnam ~ Woodcock Washburn LLP
|
|
| Chapter 18: Patent Term Adjustment and Recent Legal Developments, Prepared on May 4, 2013 |
J. Robert Dean Jr. ~ Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, L.L.P.
|
|
| Chapter 19: Navigating the Minefield of 35 USC § 102, Prepared May 5, 2013 |
Kavita Aggarwal ~ Law Offices of Kavita Aggarwal
|
|
| Chapter 20: Article of Manufacture Claims for Computer Related Inventions |
Burt Magen ~ Vierra Magen Marcus LLP
|
|
| Chapter 21: Advanced Specification and Claim Drafting, Part I (Powerpoint Slides) |
Danielle Pasqualone ~ Genentech, Inc.
Rebecca Scarr ~ Casimir Jones, S.C.
|
|
| Chapter 22: The Unsettled Law of Patent Eligible Subject Matter |
Stuart P. Meyer ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Rajiv P. Patel ~ Fenwick & West LLP
|
|
| Chapter 23: Patentable Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. 101 in the Biotech and Pharma World |
Yuko Soneoka ~ Genomic Health, Inc.
|
|
| Chapter 24: Written Description Issues and Practical Considerations in Patent Specification Drafting |
Christopher M. Tobin ~ Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC
|
|
| Chapter 25: Advanced Specification and Claim Drafting, Part II (Powerpoint Slides) |
Danielle Pasqualone ~ Genentech, Inc.
Rebecca Scarr ~ Casimir Jones, S.C.
|
|
| Chapter 26: Countering the Obviousness Rejection |
Sanjeet K. Dutta ~ King & Spalding LLP
|
|
| Chapter 27: Understanding After Final and After Allowance Patent Practice |
Rajiv P. Patel ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Daniel R. Brownstone ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Robert A. Hulse ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Brian M. Hoffman ~ Fenwick & West LLP
|
|
| Chapter 28: A Primer on Supplemental Examination and Derivation Proceedings Under AIA |
Jeffrey A. Miller ~ Dickstein Shapiro LLP
|
|
| Index to Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2013: Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing |
|
|